![]() ![]() This is consistent with how we’ve enforced our policies in the past.” When asked why Kelly’s music remains available on YouTube Music, and why that platform has different creator responsibility guidelines, a YouTube spokesperson said only: “Our creator responsibility guidelines are enforced for channels that are linked to the creator. Last month, Google said that there are 50 million subscribers to YouTube Music and YouTube Premium, which allows viewers to skip ads on videos. ![]() Kelly’s music is still allowed on YouTube through user-generated content, like cover versions of his songs, and on Kelly’s “ topic” page, which allows streaming of his recordings while a static image of his album artwork is displayed.Īnd Kelly’s music remains fully available on YouTube Music, a separate streaming platform that competes more directly with audio outlets like Spotify and Apple Music. YouTube’s stance may be the first significant action taken by a major tech platform to remove Kelly’s content. In the past, YouTube has removed the channels of creators like Austin Jones, who made popular a cappella videos and in 2019 pleaded guilty to having underage girls send him sexually explicit videos. Kelly warrant penalties beyond standard enforcement measures due to a potential to cause widespread harm.” On Tuesday, a news report in Bloomberg quoted an internal memo by Nicole Alston, YouTube’s head of legal, which said, “Egregious actions committed by R. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |